Analytics
Influencer marketing analytics and comment intelligence
Creator campaigns produce two kinds of evidence: numbers and words. NanoBuzz analytics covers both. Live dashboards track verified publications with metrics per creator, material, platform and country, organic and paid performance side by side. Comment intelligence reads what audiences actually wrote: sentiment, topics, questions, risks and purchase intent. And every metric carries its source, because honest reporting starts with saying where a number came from.
Analytics capabilities, page by page
Influencer campaign reporting
Verified publications, labelled metrics and exports that survive procurement questions.
Creator performance
Per-creator results across campaigns: delivery reliability, content quality and outcomes.
Comment sentiment analysis
What audiences wrote under campaign posts: sentiment, topics, questions, risks, purchase intent.
Social listening
Campaign-scoped listening: what conversations creators started and where they went.
Paid vs organic
Amplified and organic results on the same records, so the comparison is real.
Campaign dashboard
The live view: publications, metrics, markets and amplification status as the campaign runs.
Metrics with their sources attached
Influencer reporting has a credibility problem, and it comes from unlabelled numbers. Platform APIs expose some metrics for some account types; other figures come from verified post links or from creator-submitted statistics that need plausibility checks. These are different classes of evidence, and our reports keep them distinct: every metric is labelled with its source class, and consolidated totals state their coverage.
The same honesty applies to comments. No agency sees every comment: API access is limited, some platforms expose only partial threads, and comments keep arriving after collection. Our comment intelligence therefore reports on the corpus we collected, states its scope, and never claims to be a census. Clients get smaller, defensible numbers instead of large, unverifiable ones.
Comment intelligence at campaign scale looks like this in practice: for ORLEN Paczka our team collected 1,652 comments across the campaign's publications and classified them into sentiment, recurring topics, audience questions and purchase signals. That corpus, with its scope stated, gave the brand a readable picture of how a logistics service was being discussed, which fed directly into the next wave's briefs.
From dashboards to decisions
The live dashboard shows the campaign as it runs: publications landing, reach and impressions accumulating, markets and platforms compared, paid amplification tracked against organic baselines. Because the data is structured per creator and per material, questions like which content format is winning in which country have answers during the flight, when they can still change the plan.
Analysis ends in recommendations, not just observations. After each wave we identify which creators, formats and markets earned the next investment, which is how programs improve wave over wave. The ORLEN Paczka campaign's 170+ publications and 6.2M impressions, and the NutriBullet program's 900+ materials from 500+ creators, were both steered with exactly this loop.
- Live dashboards for the whole campaign, per market and per creator
- Organic vs paid comparison on the same publication records
- Comment intelligence: sentiment, topics, questions, risks, purchase intent
- Next-wave recommendations grounded in verified data
- Exports in PPTX, XLSX and CSV at any moment
Analytics as part of the operation, not an add-on
Our analytics is built into the same platform that runs recruitment, logistics and content review, so the data is a by-product of doing the work, not a separate collection project. A publication enters reporting when our operations team verifies it live; a comment corpus exists because the publication record points at a real URL. That is why our numbers hold up when procurement asks how they were produced.
Everything on this page is delivered as part of campaign and community engagements. If your team wants to go deeper, the subpages below describe each capability, its methods and its limits in detail.
Frequently asked questions
Do you see all comments on all campaign posts?
No, and no vendor honestly can. Comment and API visibility is partial on some platforms. We collect what is accessible, state the scope of the corpus, and analyse that corpus rather than claiming full coverage.
What does comment intelligence actually classify?
Collected comments are classified by sentiment, recurring topics, questions the audience asks, risk signals worth escalating and expressions of purchase intent.
Which export formats do you support?
PPTX for presentation-ready reports, XLSX and CSV for raw publication-level and comment-level data your own team can analyse.
Can analytics compare organic results with paid amplification?
Yes. Amplified publications carry both organic and paid metrics on the same record, so the comparison is direct rather than stitched together from two tools.
Is analytics sold as a standalone service?
It is delivered as part of NanoBuzz campaigns and community programs. For reporting on activity we did not run, talk to us about scope; we only report data we can verify or clearly label.
Plan your creator campaign
Send a short brief and get a proposal with creator mix, logistics plan and reporting scope. Or book a 30 minute intro call.